Quiz n° 21 [RISOLTO]

Discussione in 'Mezzi' iniziata da GyJeX, 8 Novembre 2006.

  1. GyJeX

    GyJeX

    Registrato:
    6 Dicembre 2005
    Messaggi:
    32.805
    Località:
    santu sezzidu in dommo
    Ratings:
    +10.240
    Quiz n° 21

    E ora un quiz storico, di quelli interessanti (il file zip contiene lo schema dell'aereo):
     

    Files Allegati:

    • uu1.jpg
      uu1.jpg
      Dimensione del file:
      45,3 KB
      Visite:
      6
    • UU2.jpg
      UU2.jpg
      Dimensione del file:
      39,7 KB
      Visite:
      3
    • UU3.jpg
      UU3.jpg
      Dimensione del file:
      33,7 KB
      Visite:
      6
    • UU4.jpg
      UU4.jpg
      Dimensione del file:
      33 KB
      Visite:
      7
    • UU5.jpg
      UU5.jpg
      Dimensione del file:
      34 KB
      Visite:
      5
    • UU6.jpg
      UU6.jpg
      Dimensione del file:
      28,2 KB
      Visite:
      5
    • Schema dell'aereo.zip
      Dimensione del file:
      116,2 KB
      Visite:
      8
  2. Ghienar

    Ghienar Banned

    Registrato:
    22 Febbraio 2006
    Messaggi:
    732
    Ratings:
    +0
    Non si è fatto avanti nessuno Gy, perchè non ci dai un piccolo aiuto? :(
     
  3. GyJeX

    GyJeX

    Registrato:
    6 Dicembre 2005
    Messaggi:
    32.805
    Località:
    santu sezzidu in dommo
    Ratings:
    +10.240
    Eh... che aiuto posso dare... vediamo... Dunque: è russo, progetto iniziato alla fine dei '30 e ha volato prima di Barbarossa, la particolarità sta negli abitacoli separati ma in comunicazione con interfono, uno dei pochi bombardieri russi progettati in questo modo, dovrebbe essersi fermato allo stadio di prototipo (almeno 4 esemplari) però ho trovato anche una citazione su una veloce costruzione in serie per 28 esemplari, cosa di cui dubito parecchio... Il resto è solo ricerca, io l'ho trovato su un'archivio di foto di aerei strani e mi ha incuriosito e prima di conoscere la denominazione ho dovuto sbattermi un bel po'...
     
  4. Gatto rognoso

    Gatto rognoso

    Registrato:
    9 Settembre 2006
    Messaggi:
    1.360
    Località:
    Casa mia
    Ratings:
    +0
    così a naso mi vien che dire Tupolev.. ma non ho trovato niente..:humm:
     
  5. Raufestin

    Raufestin

    Registrato:
    16 Agosto 2006
    Messaggi:
    1.784
    Ratings:
    +1
    Se non erro c'era anche un aereo tedesco simile che trainava gli alianti...stesso utilizzo? :)
     
  6. Gatto rognoso

    Gatto rognoso

    Registrato:
    9 Settembre 2006
    Messaggi:
    1.360
    Località:
    Casa mia
    Ratings:
    +0
    Se ce lo dà come bombardiere..
    Io son fermo col Tupolev.. Almeno è solo lì che ho visto quel tipo di elica e carenatura per il motore in stile "caccia americano anni '30" (era il mustang?) anche con la russia ci avevo preso.
    E con la cronologia ci avevo pure beccato.. ma non trovo una mazza.. :facepalm:
     
  7. Ghienar

    Ghienar Banned

    Registrato:
    22 Febbraio 2006
    Messaggi:
    732
    Ratings:
    +0
    Pensa che lo stesso Gy ha avuto difficoltà trovare notizie su questo velivolo per il quiz...figurati noi!!!!:D :)
     
  8. Gatto rognoso

    Gatto rognoso

    Registrato:
    9 Settembre 2006
    Messaggi:
    1.360
    Località:
    Casa mia
    Ratings:
    +0
    Per me non esiste.. L'ha fatto lui con "The Gimp" :D
     
  9. GyJeX

    GyJeX

    Registrato:
    6 Dicembre 2005
    Messaggi:
    32.805
    Località:
    santu sezzidu in dommo
    Ratings:
    +10.240
    eheheheheheheh, no no esiste esiste, o meglio è esistito, domani posto la soluzione ;) Comunque seguendo un vecchio consiglio, se non lo trovi nei modelli normali allora è un progetto andato a male o un'arma segreta ;) in questo caso è entrambi, un progetto di un arma segreta andato a male :D
     
  10. Ghienar

    Ghienar Banned

    Registrato:
    22 Febbraio 2006
    Messaggi:
    732
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ricorda che noi non abbiamo "l'archivio universale dei sistemi d'arma dagli albori della civiltà a pochi secondi fa" :asd: e quindi ci mettiamo un pò più di tempo per risolvere i quiz...:)
     
  11. GyJeX

    GyJeX

    Registrato:
    6 Dicembre 2005
    Messaggi:
    32.805
    Località:
    santu sezzidu in dommo
    Ratings:
    +10.240
    Allora, si tratta del "Belyayev DB-LK" qui di seguito tutto quel che ho trovato su questo aereo, naturalmente in inglese, la fonte è "Russian secret planes" di Yefim Gordon:

    Purpose: The initials stood for 'long-range
    bomber, flying wing'.
    Design Bureau: Designer's own brigade at
    the Central Aerodynamics and
    Hydrodynamics Institute.
    Viktor Nikolayevich Belyayev, born in 1896,
    began his career as a stressman in the OMOS
    bureau in 1925. He subsequently worked in
    AGOS, KOSOS-CAH1 (TsAGl), the Tupolev
    OKB, AviAvnito and Aeroflot. He liked tailless
    aircraft, and had a fixation on a 'bat wing',
    with slight forward sweep and curved-back
    tips, which he considered not only gave such
    aircraft good longitudinal stability but also
    minimised induced drag. He tested such a
    wing in his BP-2 glider of 1933, which was
    towed by an R-5 from Koktebel (Crimea) to
    Moscow. In 1934 he entered an AviAvnito
    competition for a transport with a design having
    twin fuselages, each with a 750hp Wright
    Cyclone engine and ten passenger seats, but
    this was not built.
    From this he derived the DB-LK bomber.
    Designed in 1938, the single prototype was
    completed in November 1939, but (according
    to unofficial reports) pilots declined to do
    more than make fast taxi runs, the aircraft
    being dubbed Kuritsa (chicken) in consequence.
    In early 1940 this unacceptable situation
    was ended by the appointment by GK
    Nil WS (direction of the air force scientific
    test institute) of M A Nyukhtikov as test pilot,
    assisted by lead engineer TTSamarin and
    test observer N I Shaurov. Test flying began in
    early 1940, at which time Mark Gallai also
    joined the test team. Nyukhtikov complained
    that the flight-control system was inadequate
    and that the landing-gear shock absorbers
    were weak. In the investigation that followed,
    the Commission agreed with the first point,
    but the Head of Nil WS, AI Filin, thought the
    landing gear satisfactory. He then changed
    his mind when a leg collapsed with himself at
    the controls (see photo). Later the main legs
    were not only redesigned but were also inclined
    forward, to improve directional stability
    on the ground and avoid dangerous swing.
    Later in 1940 the Nil WS ordered the DB-LK
    to be abandoned, despite its outstanding performance,
    and the planned imminent installation
    of l,100hp M-88 engines. Belyayev had
    by this time designed a refined version with
    1,700hp M-71 engines, but was told that the
    DB-3F (later redesignated IL-4) would remain
    the standard long-range bomber.
    Belyayev left comprehensive aerodynamic
    details, showing that the strange wing was of
    CAHI (TsAGI) MV-6bis profile over the longchord
    centroplan (centre section) but Gottingen
    387 profile over the supposed 'bat-like'
    outer panels. Overall aspect ratio was no less
    than 8.2, and the outer wings had a leadingedge
    sweep of minus 5° 42', with a taper ratio
    of 7. The airframe was almost entirely a modern
    light-alloy stressed-skin structure, the
    wing having five spars. There is evidence the
    structural design was modern, with most
    components pressed or even machined from
    sheet. The outer wings had flaps of the unusual
    Zapp type, extended to 45°, with Frise
    ailerons outboard, which even had miniature
    sections on the back-raked tips. Ahead of the
    ailerons were slats.
    At each end of the centroplan was a fuselage,
    of basically circular section. On the front
    of each was a Tumanskii (Mikulin KB) M-87B
    14-cylinder radial engine (Gnome-Rhone ancestry)
    rated at 950hp, driving a VISh-23D
    three-blade variable-pitch propeller of 3.3m
    (10ft l0in) diameter weighing 152kg (335 Ib).
    The engines were housed in modern longchord
    cowlings, with pilot-operated cooling
    gills. Tanks in the wings and fuselages housed
    3,444 litres (757.6 Imperial gallons, 910 US gallons)
    of fuel, with all tanks protected by nitrogen
    inerting.
    On the centreline at the rear was a large
    (7.0m2, 75.3ft2) single fin and a 1.94m2 (20.9ft2)
    rudder with a large trim tab. High on the fin, above the rudder, was fixed a small (0.85m2,
    9.15ft2) tailplane to which were pivoted the
    enormous elevators of 4.8m2 (51.7ft2) total
    area, each with a large tab.
    Each fuselage was provided with a main
    landing gear, with a single oleo strut on the
    outer side of the axle for a single wheel with
    a 900 x 300mm tyre, with a hydraulic brake.
    Each unit retracted rearwards hydraulically.
    On the centreline at the rear was the fixed
    castoring tailwheel, with a 450 x 150 tyre.
    The intention was that the series (production)
    DB-LK should have a pilot in the front of
    the left fuselage, a navigator in front on the
    right, and gunners in each tailcone. The gunners,
    entering like the others via roof hatches,
    should manage the radio as well as pairs of
    ShKAS 7.62mm machine guns, with a ±10°
    field of fire in all directions. Two more ShKAS
    fired ahead on the centreline, aimed by the
    pilot, and for the six guns a total of 4,500
    rounds were provided. Behind each maingear
    bay was a bomb bay, with powered
    doors (see underside view). Each could carry
    an FAB-1000 (2,205 Ib) bomb, or four FAB-250
    (551 Ib) bombs, or many other smaller stores.
    Predictably, the full military equipment was
    never fitted, though radio was installed
    throughout the flight trials.
    Despite its strikingly unconventional appearance,
    the DB-LK appeared to be a practical
    bomber with outstanding flight performance.
    Compared with the established WS bomber
    it had the same number of similar engines,
    and even half the number of landing-gear
    oleos, despite having twice the number of
    fuselages and weapon bays. From today's
    distance, it might have been worth pursuing
    this formula a little further.
    Four views of DB-LK, one showing landing-gear
    failure.
    24
    Dimensions
    Span 21.6m 70 ft 1014 in
    Length 9.78 m 32 ft 1 in
    Wing area 56.87m2 612ft2
    Note: various other figures for span (21.4 m) and wing area (59 m2)
    have appeared.
    Weights
    Empty (also given as 5,655 kg) 6,004 kg
    Normal loaded weight 9,061 kg
    Max loaded weight 10,672kg
    (also given as 9,285 kg)
    Performance
    Max speed at sea level, 395 km/h
    at 5,100m (16,730 ft) 488 km/h
    Take-off speed 1 45 km/h
    Max rate of climb 6.15m/s
    Time to climb to 3,000 m 8.2 min
    Time to climb to 5,000 m 1 3.6 min
    Service ceiling 8,500 m
    Range (with 1,000 kg bombload)
    at normal gross weight 1 ,270 km
    maximum 2,900 km
    Landing speed 1 50 km/h
     
  12. Gatto rognoso

    Gatto rognoso

    Registrato:
    9 Settembre 2006
    Messaggi:
    1.360
    Località:
    Casa mia
    Ratings:
    +0
    "Belyayev" :confused: Va beh che in quanto a conoscenza della materia rasento lo zero e gooogle mi dà una mano grossa come una casa ma.. mai sentito.. mi fermo massimo a "Beriev".. :humm:
     
  13. BadBlackBear

    BadBlackBear

    Registrato:
    17 Febbraio 2006
    Messaggi:
    759
    Località:
    Trento
    Ratings:
    +2
    questa era davvero cattiva... 1 punto a gy, per non aver fatto indovinare a nessuno :D
     

Condividi questa Pagina